Yes, I agree with this too and I had also my "FUN" with my printed parts.....Thats why I exluded mecahnical printed parts later in my build, like the spool for the fishing line....But look, what I mean is, even if the printed parts that holds the frame are a bit smaller or a bit larger than the original design, then there shouldn t be a problem with the geometry as long as they are identical to each other.
Let us wait for the video and see...I think it is the reflector. I believe there is a fan at the hotend and the way it is hold makes me think it is the mini kossel reflector that has been installed but the carriage is the original from Rich. If this is true, this will explain why changing rods length in the firmware made things better, because the reflector has a different offset than the original and this will change the result of the radius calculated by the firmware. Anyway if it is the reflector, the problem will not disapear with calibration but only by either changing the carriage or -as I did- adding nuts and longer M3 at the carriage to add at least 10 mm spacing between the parallel rods.
Let us wait for the video and see...I think it is the reflector. I believe there is a fan at the hotend and the way it is hold makes me think it is the mini kossel reflector that has been installed but the carriage is the original from Rich. If this is true, this will explain why changing rods length in the firmware made things better, because the reflector has a different offset than the original and this will change the result of the radius calculated by the firmware. Anyway if it is the reflector, the problem will not disapear with calibration but only by either changing the carriage or -as I did- adding nuts and longer M3 at the carriage to add at least 10 mm spacing between the parallel rods.